Mastering Board Communication
In-Depth Interview
Executive Summary
A board meeting once ground to a halt for twenty-five minutes over a thirty-dollar ladder. That's the story I told when Authority Magazine asked me for my five tips on being an effective board member — a healthcare board had just rubber-stamped a hundred-million-dollar construction project and a multi-million dollar equipment purchase without much discussion, then came alive arguing about whether a new roof ladder should be eight feet or ten, wood or metal, what color to paint it.
That's the trap boards fall into: talking about what's easy to have an opinion on instead of what actually moves the business. The stronger habit is numerical literacy — early in my career an investor handed me a thirty-six-tab spreadsheet to track board meetings, and while I don't use that document anymore, the lesson stuck: if it can't be measured, it hasn't really happened.
I also talked about the smaller things that build trust between meetings — a British colleague once told me she'd "write me into her diary," and it took a second for my American brain to catch that she meant her calendar. That kind of context-switching matters, and so does honest reporting. I once coached a CRO who only ever brought the board good news, and we pulled him aside: it's okay to tell us it's raining outside — what we need is an informed view of how much longer we'll need our umbrellas out. Boards that get that kind of unfiltered communication, plus a willingness to keep re-examining their own assumptions the way Netflix cannibalized its own DVD business before someone else could, end up with directors instead of rubber stamps.
